This file restores the earlier claim-by-claim comparison of public statements by the OppermanReport Reddit account against the public civil dockets. It does not decide whether the underlying sexual-assault allegation was true or false.
3 supporting witness affidavits
The final New York docket lists three declarations total: Jane Doe’s own declaration plus Tiffany Doe and Joan Doe declarations. The controlled correction is to distinguish the plaintiff’s declaration from the two other declarants rather than describe all three as separate supporting witnesses.
I havent read it in years
The account made that statement while discussing complaint details. The statement is relevant to how much weight to place on memory-based descriptions of the filing.
went on for a year
The litigation sequence began with the California filing in late April 2016 and the final New York action ended in early November 2016. The final New York case itself lasted only weeks. “A year” overstates the public docket chronology.
Judge Abrams / serious bar
The located October 2016 order schedules an initial status conference and requests routine case-management information. The order contains no finding that the plaintiff was authentic or that the allegations had been validated.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/comments/1m42jh4/katie_johnson_raped_by_trump_epstein/ ↗
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/19421595/Doe_v_Trump_et_al ↗